Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
So, the fact that Congress shows that they have the authority to decide who is a born citizen says that all subsequent law through the years is not some violation of the Constitution.

The 1795 Act is a naturalization statute.

Here let me help you: The 1795 Act is a NATURALIZATION STATUTE.

I apologize to other readers for having to take such extreme measures. Poster xzins must suffer low-vision hence the font effects.

164 posted on 08/15/2013 8:08:37 AM PDT by Ray76 ( Common sense immigration reform: Enforce Existing Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: Ray76

And within that statute on naturalization it spells out who is a citizen by birth, so that there is no confusion.

Someone who is BORN a US citizen has no need of naturalization. Is there something tough about that concept?

Cruz does NOT have naturalization papers. Why?

Because he was NOT naturalized. Because he was BORN a US citizen.

Show me a copy of his papers or where ANYONE says he has naturalization papers OR concede.


166 posted on 08/15/2013 8:16:14 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson