Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

Please show where “citizen” equals “natural born citizen”.

Why can a Senator or Representative be a citizen, but a President must be a natural born citizen?

If the whole idea of adding the words “natural born” to the requirements for President by the Constitutional Convention was to make sure a President did not have divided loyalties to America,how does that apply to someeone not born of two citizen parents?

Ted Cruz was born in Canada, so Canada can claim him as a citizen.

Ted Cruz’s mom was an American, so he can be an American citizen.

Ted Cruz’s dad was a Cuban citizen, so Cuba could claim him as a citizen.

Three countries have a claim on Cruz. How is that not a case of divided loyalties?

Which of the three countries takes precedence?

A law of naturalization does not supplant the Constitution.

Neither does the 14th Amendment change the requirements for the Presidency.

You cannot keep claiming “citizen” is equivalent to “natural born citizen”, otherwise any anchor baby is eligible to be President of the United States.


179 posted on 08/13/2013 7:55:57 PM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]


To: JCBreckenridge; exit82

What matters is how US law reads. The US law is a fact. Fight with that all you want, and at the end of the day it will still be US law. Cruz, by US law, was born an automatic US citizen. That makes him eligible, by US law, for the presidency.

If there were a law to the contrary, I’m sure you’d be citing it.


243 posted on 08/14/2013 5:52:21 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson