Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Old Retired Army Guy
That is an excellent question and one which I am positive will never be brought up.

IMO, Did removing forces from the tribal areas to centralized fortifications result in fewer if any available helos in the area. Couple that with the reported 7 “friendly” Afghan personnel on the ship, the fact that helo was probably made in the 1960s as it was a reserve craft, and the reason for the mission in the first place without suitable support leaves many questions unanswered such as why not dispatch single wing planes to attack something like 10-15 enemy fighters pinning the Rangers down. Also, how did His Excellency's rules for engagement affect the outcome, like no night operations, no firing into “friendly” villages etc.

This whole thing reeks. As a high school teacher I heard say when the class failed miserably on oral recitation: when the blind lead the blind, they all fall in the ditch.

13 posted on 08/12/2013 6:34:42 AM PDT by Mouton (108th MI Group.....68-71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Mouton

As far as I know SEALs don’t go into any situation without weeks or even months of planning. They also usually operate in teams of 6-8 certainly not 22 of them and all crammed onto a single crappy helicopter. This was a total setup. Not even close to normal SOP.


18 posted on 08/12/2013 7:14:03 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson