Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pabianice; Abundy; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; bayliving; BFM; Bigg Red; ...

What the article seems to be implying, though I’m not sure that’s what the NYT wanted to imply, is that in order for women to stay home and raise the kids without unduly hurting themselves, there has to be firm legal support for marriage within the society, i.e., getting rid of no-fault-divorce laws and re-criminalizing adultery, so that there is a safer environment for stay-at-home spouses.

With our current, maritally-unstable society, is it any wonder that so many formerly-successful women end up alone and in the gutter, after choosing to be stay-at-home moms?

Maryland “Freak State” PING!


72 posted on 08/12/2013 7:08:00 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (I am in charge!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
there has to be firm legal support for marriage within the society, i.e., getting rid of no-fault-divorce laws and re-criminalizing adultery, so that there is a safer environment for stay-at-home spouses.

With our current, maritally-unstable society, is it any wonder that so many formerly-successful women end up alone and in the gutter, after choosing to be stay-at-home moms?

You nailed it. Twice.

73 posted on 08/12/2013 9:20:49 PM PDT by Albion Wilde ("Remember... the first revolutionary was Satan."--Russian Orthodox Archpriest Dmitry Smirnov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson