Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: QQQQ

I’m reading a history of the battle now. The one thing that seems to be developing is that the Russians were profligate with their troops. I suspect that mentality was behind the jaw-dropping casualty figures. That and the German Tiger 1s.


57 posted on 08/11/2013 9:14:04 AM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: IronJack

It’s like the German general said during the early days of Barbarossa when it appeared the Germans would wipe out the Russians.

“It’s a fight between an Elephant and a bunch of ants, the elephant will kill millions of ants, but ultimately the sheer number of ants will eat the elephant down to the bone.”


58 posted on 08/11/2013 9:16:26 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: IronJack
Mistakes was made by both Soviets and Germans. hitler didn't listen to his advisers. Soviet command took a huge gamble by concentrating 75% of their Armored forces at Kursk. The battle of Kursk was a turning point of the WWII. Speaking about unnecessary casualties among Soviet troops, you are correct. We are taking about astronomical numbers. Most likely seven digits during the WWII.
60 posted on 08/11/2013 9:42:20 AM PDT by QQQQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: IronJack

One more important detail. In the mid to late 30’s,stalin’s top commanders warned him about hitler’s military ambitions and the need to improve Soviet military. stalin was very busy at that time with repressions and killing of the Soviet military elite. This act alone caused millions of victims among civilians and military personnel during WWII.


63 posted on 08/11/2013 10:00:18 AM PDT by QQQQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson