Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: green iguana

“In no instance can it be justified to spend $100,000 in public resources to increase an individual’s expected survival by three months”

Sorry, if I am being forced to pay for “insurance” you better prolong my life.

Then again, you should have a choice. The government program which kills you when you are no longer viable or the private program.


23 posted on 08/09/2013 12:03:32 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (The reason we own guns is to protect ourselves from those wanting to take our guns from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: EQAndyBuzz

“if I am being forced to pay for “insurance” you better prolong my life”

It’s not insurance, it’s a tax. IMO, an unconstitutional tax, Justice Roberts’ opinion nonwithstanding.


26 posted on 08/09/2013 12:09:01 PM PDT by green iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: EQAndyBuzz
“In no instance can it be justified to spend $100,000 in public resources to increase an individual’s expected survival by three months”

The real question should be why the treatment costs $100,000.00 in the first place.

The same drug is probably available in Mexico for $30.00.

78 posted on 08/12/2013 11:14:46 PM PDT by itsahoot (It is not so much that history repeats, but that human nature does not change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson