So please grade me on my scenario, Rev!
Abdul the Terrorist calls the bank to check up on that deposit from the Saudi Wahhabi Oil Sheik Benevolent Fund (The same fund that gives Obama money to oppose the Keystone pipeline and pays John McCain to advocate war with Syria)), and so that bank clerk he talked to is the 1st degree of separation. Later that day a pizza store owner calls into that bank and our newly made person-of-interest clerk answers questions about his checking account, that’s the degree of separation number 2. That evening you call in a take-out pizza. Now you’re the 3rd degree of separation. So it’s ok to spy on you without a warrant, right?
Seriously, they’ve thrown the Constitution we took a mortal oath to right into the garbage.
Put me on the list or else!
You are correct. It’s not as if terrorist infiltrators don’t eat pizza. And those “secret cells”...why they require by their nature that more than one degree of separation be used.
What we don’t have yet is a smoking gun admitting they’re using the “degrees of separation” scheme or something similar to it. At least I’ve not heard it yet.
But it only makes sense that they would use it, doesn’t it?