Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doorgunner69

Pretty close anyway. ASROC and the more modern vertical launch ASROC were surface ship launched while the Subroc is submarine launched, but all are anti submarine weapons.

Harpoon is an anti surface ship weapon.

And while ASROC had (no longer) a nuclear and conventional torpedo option, the SUBROC had only a nuclear option. The use, I assume, is for long range time urgent ASW, giving the target no warning and no chance of escape. SeaLance was suppose to replace it but the end of the Cold War ended funding, leaving a vacancy in what the SUBROC did. The Mark-48 ADCAP torpedo is the only anti sub weapon on US subs now from what I understand.

The Russians retain the SS-N-15 Starfish which is very similar in function.


47 posted on 08/10/2013 7:11:51 PM PDT by Wildbill22 (They have us surrounded again, the poor bastards- Gen Creighton Williams Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Wildbill22

My whole point is that the role of SUBROC is now un filled in the USN, whereas our former Cold War adversary still have similar weapons in their inventory.


48 posted on 08/11/2013 7:13:19 AM PDT by Wildbill22 (They have us surrounded again, the poor bastards- Gen Creighton Williams Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Wildbill22

My whole point is that the role of SUBROC is now un filled in the USN, whereas our former Cold War adversary still have similar weapons in their inventory.


49 posted on 08/11/2013 7:13:20 AM PDT by Wildbill22 (They have us surrounded again, the poor bastards- Gen Creighton Williams Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson