um... so basically according to this you could have only 38 (not the 50 specified) full time employees working 40 hours a week and have to provide coverage since the law defines full time as 30 hours.
It doesn’t work that way.
They define 30/week as a ‘full time position’, and are using that number for part-timers to increase the cost of hiring part-timers.
It still can be worked around by converting full timers to ‘exempt staff’, and working them a shift and a half.
No, that would be wrong. Under these terms if you “think” you may “someday” you may need to have someone(s) working a total of 30 hours or more in any number of consecutive years, bla, bla, bla, bla.
You have to forfeit all your profits for the rest of your natural life and 150% of your profits for eternity.
Unless you are a member of congress or some other government POS in which case you get all the money, none of the obligations and a free ride for life.