Interesting stuff.
Like comparing Deusenbergs to Toyotas.
I’m just interested in functionality as opposed to cosmetics so I’m not too worried.
The functionality of the Python was that it had an exquisite trigger, the “bank vault” lock-up and impressive accuracy. It was, functionally, at the very top of the double action revolver field. Everything else was a step down from the level of performance of the Pythons. Due to the tighter chambers, the tighter cylinder-to-breech gap (half or less than that of S&W’s revolvers) and the clockwise rotation (which wants to rotate the cylinder into the frame, not out as on a S&W), they achieved a premium product in most all aspects.
Again, there’s a reason why they command such demand and value in the used gun market.
If all you want is functionality, then buy a Ruger GP-100. They’re cast, have an OK finish, and they work. But I doubt they’ll ever command a premium.