Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar
It is just not being enforced.

That is what I call broken. And I do not speak in code, I say what I mean. I am not for amnesty, I am not for any program that plans to bring in 33 million more immigrants in the next ten years.

Okay?

25 years ago my husband and I sailed into San Diego in our boat that had a huge Welsh Dragon painted on each bow, and a Canadian flag painted on each side of the hull at the stern. An INS agent surmised that we were sneaking in, in broad daylight, and harassed us for three days, hoping that he could fine us as the San Diego office had fined other Canadian flag yachts at about the same time.

I recognized that he was getting job satisfaction by harassing middle-class Caucasians, because the situation at California's border was uncontrollable -no job satisfaction at all.

That is what I mean by broken. Wheel-spinning, ineffectiveness, and bullying of the vulnerable.

149 posted on 08/05/2013 3:06:16 PM PDT by maica (Welcome to post-rational America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]


To: maica
That is what I call broken. And I do not speak in code, I say what I mean.

Marco Rubio, John McCain, Lindsey Graham,, Chuck Schumer, Dick Durbin, etc. also say that the system is broken. What they propose will not make it better, but rather, exacerbate the situation. When you adopt the lexicon of the left, you can expect misunderstandings as to where you stand.

I am not for amnesty

How do you define the word amnesty? Paul Ryan and Marco Rubio say their plan is not amnesty. Do you support Cantor's proposed bill on Dreamers?

I recognized that he was getting job satisfaction by harassing middle-class Caucasians, because the situation at California's border was uncontrollable -no job satisfaction at all.

Judge Dismisses ICE Agents' Lawsuit Challenging Obama's Deferred Action

"In his decision to dismiss the case, O’Connor, sitting in Dallas, Texas, nonetheless reiterated his view that DACA was inherently unlawful."

“Plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that the Department of Homeland Security has implemented a program contrary to congressional mandate,” he said in his ruling."

The problem is that the political leadership of the Executive Branch will not let the agents enforce the laws despite the fact that the President has sworn to faithfully execute the laws of the United States of America.

The National Immigration and Customs Enforcement Council of the American Federation of Government Employees, includes at least 7,000 ICE agents and employees, voted a resounding 259-0 for a resolution telling management of their "growing dissatisfaction and concern" of Assistant Secretary John Morton, who now heads ICE. The vote of no confidence also reached to Phyllis Coven, assistant director for the ICE agency's office of detention policy and planning as well.

The resolution implied that ICE management had "abandoned the agency's core mission of enforcing U.S. immigration laws and providing for public safety," the voting body thought they (ICE leadership) were more likely "to campaign for programs and policies related to amnesty and the creation of a special detention system for foreign nationals that exceeds the care and services provided to most U.S. citizens similarly incarcerated.”

That is what I mean by broken. Wheel-spinning, ineffectiveness, and bullying of the vulnerable.

Bullying of the vulnerable? BS. Who are the vulnerable?

150 posted on 08/06/2013 9:58:35 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson