Respectfully disagree:
A) The true, full effect will not be felt in time for any measurable beneficial feedback effect in 2014. This is murder by slow poison, and your recommendation, though I understand the good intentions, simply lets more poison creep into a subject who has already been too passive.
B) The true, full effect of Obamacare will be loss of freedom, loss of health, and loss of life. It may be possible to recover lost freedom, and perhaps some lost health as well. But there is no recovery from loss of life. The recommendation to simply acquiesce to the inevitability of Obamacare’s full implementation is tantamount to asking some number of your fellow Americans to die so the useful idiot demographic has a chance to realize how bad Obamacare really is. That is too much to ask of anyone, let alone our fellow countrymen.
I know this is not intentional, and I know how overwhelming it appears to try and fight this monster, but we have no other moral choice. We are fighting not just for freedom, but for the very lives of multitudes of innocent people endangered by the utopian fantasies of the left, and that fight must never go on holiday.
I just wish people who oppose Obamacare would avoid ATTACKING each other.
The GOAL is exactly the same.
It is the MEANS to achieve the goal that’s different and we should be discussing the pros and cons of the means, not each other’s motives.
Its a lot like allowing amnesty go forward to show people how bad it will be. They’ll find out how bad it is and be stuck with it for the rest of their lives.