CIA Agents Who Were In Benghazi Warned By CIA: Keep Silent – “You Jeopardize Your Family”

Freedom Outpost ^ | Aug 2, 2013 | Tim Brown

[EXCH54FE]

On Thursday, CNN’s Jake Tapper reported that the Central Intelligence Agency is now pressuring agents who were on the ground in Benghazi, Libya on the night of September 11, 2012 to keep silent and not talk to Congress or the media.

The Hill reports:

The CIA allegedly had “dozens” of agency operatives on the ground at the U.S. diplomatic annex in Benghazi, Libya, during last year’s deadly terrorist attack that ended with the deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.

Langley is taking extreme measures to mask the agency’s operations in Benghazi and in northern Libya at the time of the strike, according to CNN.

Agency employees involved with CIA operations in the country are being subjected to monthly polygraph tests, among other counterintelligence measures, an unnamed source told CNN.

“Sources now tell CNN dozens of CIA agents were on the ground that night,” Tapper reported, “and the CIA is going to great lengths to make sure whatever they were doing and what happened that night remains a secret.”

“It’s being described as pure intimidation with the threat that any unauthorized CIA employees who leaks information could face the end of his or her career,” Griffin added.

The report a communication was referenced by a CIA source which revealed the effects of the threats against the agents.

“You don’t jeopardize yourself, you jeopardize your family as well,” an anonymous source wrote. “You have no idea the amount of pressure being brought to bear on anyone with knowledge of this operation,” another source added.

“In the aftermath of the attack, [Rep. Frank] Wolf(R-VA) said he was contacted by people closely tied with CIA operatives and contractors who wanted to talk. Then suddenly, there was silence.”

[Count of Monte Fisto]

“Sources now tell CNN dozens of CIA agents were on the ground that night,” Tapper reported, “and the CIA is going to great lengths to make sure whatever they were doing and what happened that night remains a secret.”

The CIA operatives were probably directing the local "security" troops to eliminate Stevens and the other witnesses to the gun running of Libyan weapons, including thousands of shoulder launched SAMs, to the Al Qaeda terrorists slaughtering Christians in Syria. Dead men tell no tales.

[winodog]

Mitt would have made little difference. He was selected to run and would do the bidding of the globalists and Satanists who run the criminal enterprise known as the D of C.

Ted Cruz and a handful of others who speak out do so at the risk of harming their families as well as themselves. All the other reps tow the line.

And last, the real battle is spiritual wickedness that we cannot see with our eyes. God has turned us over to our enemies just as the Bible says He does when His people turn from God.

[Sheapdog]

I agree

[gr8eman]

Got that right!

[Fair Paul]

Why do Irene Kennedy and Mitch Rapp have to be fictional characters?

[PATRIOT1876]

The government thug equivalent of “Fings break doan ney?”

[Veto!]

Good letter, but more effective if you include a link to the source:

http://frontpagemag.com/2013/colonel-phil-handley/betrayal-in-benghazi/

[left that other site]

Indeed.

And it might explain a lot of other craziness that we have seen coming from people we thought were conservatives.

[cyn]

Thanks for posting that.

[B4Ranch]

Thanks for caring about our foreign service personnel.

[longfellow]

Yes but they finally have a new documentary coming out about this to prove he covered it up, that POS!

[Andy from Chapel Hill]

The CIA was buying Saddam’s hidden WMD’s from Syrian rebels.

IMHO.

Not much else would cause this reaction.

Note: I have absolutely no proof of this theory.