Why is Yahoo such a POS search engine?
The World may never know.
To be clear, Matt Berman was just assigned to do a hit piece on Sarah and did it. Mission accomplished for the Obama buttlicking Matt.
What this fake journalist DOESN'T do is provide context for this story. In June 2011 and June 2012, there was a clear momentum for conservatives going into a presidential election year.
What Miss Matt Berman ALSO doesn't do is tell you how other PACs are spending and raising money...are Sarah's numbers out of line with other political action committees in the year AFTER a presidential election and NOT the year of mid-term?
This kind of garbage is what poses at journalism at the National Journal?
Oh, and the rest of the article is just criticism for Sarah paying consultants....as if no other PACs pay consultants. Nothing illegal going on, apparently, it is just that Matt is wondering if we ought to be concerned....
Gag.
Maybe I'll just go over to Sarahpac and give her some more money now....
Please show me where they’ve delved into any other politician or private citizen’s PAC in any detail. For instance: Hillary Clinton. No, you say? Curious.
They are akin to the race baiters, they believe they found their little corner to continue their circle jerks.
So damn tired of all the crazy dysfunction, everywhere.
fyi.
Is this the turkey that’s been writing hit pieces on her for years?
Why is Yahoo such a POS search engine?
The World may never know.
lol
“To be clear” we are breaking from RINOS!! to the FREEDOM party and the “whigs” are truey history unless they deal with us,
Which means she is generous to a fault.
I like her.
It’s so nice to see they are worried about her.
bttt
Gov. Palin absolutely scares the snot out of them, doesn’t she?
I recall that weasel John Avlon wrote a similar hit piece on Sarah’s PAC several months ago. Hmmm...I detect a pattern here.
Both liberal Democrats and moderate Republicans are afraid of Sarah because she is Conservative and is not afraid to articulate conservative ideas.
Isn’t she supposed to be irrelevant?
“You’re right, I did lose a million dollars last year. I expect to lose a million dollars this year. I expect to lose a million dollars next year. You know, Mr. Thatcher, at the rate of a million dollars a year, I’ll have to close this place in... 60 years.”
The money will be there when she indicates where/when it is needed.
How many people has the PAC supported that not only has she supported but we have given directly to their treasury.
It was a big news story this week when a pro-Hillary group raised one million.
Non-story.
I don’t know why she even needs a PAC.
All she has to do is to tweet an endorsement in a Republican primary and everyone knows where she stands.
She doesn’t need a PAC for that.
This is a fine example of why I cancelled my subscriptions to the National Review and the Weekly Standard. Every now and then it is good to remember.....