Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SMARTY
It is easier to sort out familial obligations when the family tree doesn't look like a briar patch. It also makes it easier to determine who is related to who, at least closely enough that bad genetics aren't amplified--the results of which would be evident even before genetics were understood.

Whether people simply listened to scripture, or whether they had worked out that this was best, having codified it with rules for marriage made sense for a healthier population.

14 posted on 07/30/2013 6:21:56 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe
Right, and I think too that people understood early on that the possibility of birth defects increased in children born to parents who were TOO closely related.

All sorts of marriage taboos were worked out to avoid this. Also, I think that the 'raids' (to steal women) and fighting between tribes was a way to expand the gene pool... even though primitive people didn't comprehend DNA.

16 posted on 07/30/2013 6:27:40 AM PDT by SMARTY ("The test of every religious, political, or educational system is the man that it forms." H. Amiel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson