Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog

I have no idea what you are talking about.

Nor do you.

The argument was for people to, when they mis interpret the Church teaching, to prove that what they are so positive about exists in Church teaching.

In this case they could not.

The argument is over.

I won the argument.

Life goes on.


495 posted on 07/30/2013 1:53:49 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies ]


To: stanne
I'll explain it to you in REALLY simple language so perhaps it will penetrate.

Your assertion that the Church does NOT say that one must be a practicing member of the RCC to obtain salvation is correct.

But that is not the whole story, and the whole truth requires acknowledging what the Church DOES say, and what that statement means.

Your "argument", by failing to tell the WHOLE truth is as misleading as those mistaken parties who are claiming that the RCC claims that one must be a practicing Catholic to be saved.

You "won" nothing, but proved yourself, at bottom, to be one who fails to tell the whole truth, but only that part of it that "fits your story".

499 posted on 07/30/2013 4:41:00 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 495 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson