Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rlmorel
Hamilton wanted vigorous and effective government, but not big government. This is because big government would have required a high rate of taxation to support it, and that would have been bad for business.

Hamilton would have been willing to have his vigorous and effective government intervene on behalf of the commercial and speculative classes, i.e., business, but he would have been repulsed by direct government payments to people.

21 posted on 07/28/2013 12:55:15 PM PDT by Publius (And so, night falls on civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Publius

Repulsed by direct gov’tm. payments to the people, naturally! It is antithetical to business principles.


22 posted on 07/28/2013 3:09:17 PM PDT by definitelynotaliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Publius

Agreed. Hamilton has a bad name around here because he was a Federalist, but you and I are in agreement. I simply think that for the time, his advocacy of that was needed.

Like potato chips, though, they just didn’t know where to stop...:)


27 posted on 07/28/2013 4:19:28 PM PDT by rlmorel (Silence: The New Hate Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson