Christian (I notice you didn’t capitalize that btw) and empathy have nothing to do with basic biology.
Women are the rate limiting step and the rate determining factor in the human reproduction equation.
Women can’t have more than about 1 baby per year and that’s pushing it if you do that sequentially. And only women can have the babies. 1 man can father children with umpteen women. But only women between about 14 and 40 can have those babies. 50yr old women don’t count.
As for ‘expendable male’, ask why patriarchial societies (most of Western Civ) have traditionally fought wars and them with only men? While men might be ‘expendable’ from a biological standpoint (wrt sheer numbers), you as a group are generally smarter (more high IQ men than women by a large number that increases as IQ gets higher), you are physically stronger, physically larger and aren’t ‘encumbered’ for 9m with that future human. Women are very vulnerable, physically, while pregnant.
As far as expendable again, why do men make wars? I haven’t found a good answer for that one...
you’re still a hypocrite and have no empathy for moms who feel the same about their boys as you do about your daughter. rationalize it however you want.
you have a nice day.
Historically, men have made wars for the benefit of women. Wars get fought, at root, either to secure resources, or to defend resources, and to create a viable environment for the women to have children in.
The driving factor of WWI was Germany desiring access to colonies in Africa and elsewhere, to secure resources. The driving factor of WW2 was Germany wanting land to the east ( Lebensraum ) and Japan wanting to conquer resource-rich Allied colonies in Asia and the Pacific.