Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Black Agnes

this is where you went wrong. the guy is not advocating the draft. just like he didn’t say he wants your daughter blown up.

he and everyone else is commenting about the male libtard mentality running the military that believes women in combat is good, and equal treatment and ‘fair’ to women. they cannot even see their own hypocrisy that because women are not required to register for the draft, and now have to have different standards, they are still hardly treating them truly equal and as fair as every other guy there.

and he also made the ‘blown up’ comment that the male libtards running the military cannot see how awful and stupid their decision to put women in combat is, and that it will probably take a couple thousand female combat troop deaths, which will also result in more men dying in combat because the women are there, before the libtards finally figure out that women in combat is not a good idea.

he was not advocating women in combat and i didn’t either. he was ponting out since they aren’t drafted and will/have different training they will be said to be ‘equal’ and treated equal, but clearly they won’t be. he was saying if you truly want to be fair and treat them equally, they should have to register and have to pass the same standards. but the libtard hypocrites ignore this and just go on sayng they are equal but they don’t have to register and they will have lesser standards to meet.

this is us ripping the libtard logic that thinks this is a good idea. that poster and i do not think it’s a good idea. if you go back and read all our comments with this context in mind you will see exactly what we’ ve said all/along confirms this.


131 posted on 07/27/2013 5:17:23 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: Secret Agent Man

Actually they WERE advocating the draft. There’s a cadre of them on these threads that ‘I got drafted all those women should have to sign up at 18 just like we did’ ‘haha, serve them right, etc’.

I can point out specific posts if you like.

And there WILL be women in hard combat. And within 10 years there WILL be a draft. Wait for it.

I’m not sure how we stop either at this point. We didn’t stop unhealthcare, we didn’t stop repeal of DADT, we won’t stop immivasion and they WILL be drafting 18yr old women just out of HS for whatever the next A shau or fallujah. At which point I will assume they just want MY children dead. Without even the possibility of a fair fight thrown in via biology.

It’s not that I don’t have feeling for mothers of sons but they’ve at least got biology on their side. My youngest, who’s in the 10th%tile for WOMEN size couldn’t likely hump a 40lb pack any great distance. Much less survive a forced march with an 80lb pack or any decent amount of ammo or weapon. Her only advantage would be smaller target profile.

I would be forced to consider her being drafted and sent into combat as homicide with malice aforethought. My 6’5” nephew could hold his own.

I say this as a female. If I were on a specops team, as a guy, and ‘leadership’ put an unqualified female on my team for political purposes MY first trick out of the box would be to frag her. So the rest of the team would stand a better chance of survival. Then again, females might be smaller, weaker and less suited for warfare but we’re WAY meaner. Way. Men would sacrifice the whole team for the female’s safety and well being. Although the young men today MIGHT feel a little differently, having been subjected to affirmative action descrimination GRRRRRL power for their whole lives.


132 posted on 07/27/2013 5:41:01 PM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson