The lady clearly said, she wanted to vote her heart .. guilty .. 'CAUSE THE EVIDENCE PROVED IT ... (which it didn't) ... but because the law wouldn't allow her to put an innocent man in prison ... she HAD to vote 'not guilty'.
What a mish/mash of I think I think.
It's complete mish/mash BS! You have to either be filled with racism, bigotry, or idiocy to make a statement suggesting the evidence showed GZ was guilty. There wasn't a SHRED of evidence to convict GZ, furthermore, the evidence showed the OPPOSITE of what the prosecutor intended it to show.
There is no question GZ HAD to defend himself. That's what the evidence showed.
J-B29 is filled probably with all of what I stated regardless of the selective editing from ABC scum.