Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney; All
For background:

1) I am pro-nuke. Big time.
2) I am somewhat ignorant of the geology around San Onofre.

Question:

How geologically unstable is that area? Historically, is it subject to tsunami (or other) flooding?

13 posted on 07/25/2013 7:38:51 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ArrogantBustard

The power plant is included in the areas for tsunami inundation.

http://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/geologic_hazards/Tsunami/Inundation_Maps/SanDiego/Documents/Tsunami_Inundation_SanOnofreBluff_Quad_SanDiego.pdf


14 posted on 07/25/2013 7:46:49 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: ArrogantBustard

Southern California Edison states the station was “built to withstand a 7.0 magnitude earthquake directly under the plant”. Additionally, there is a 25-foot tsunami wall to protect the plant from a rogue wave that could be potentially generated by the active fault 5 miles offshore. The closest tectonic fault line is the Christianitos fault, which is considered inactive or “dead”.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Onofre_Nuclear_Generating_Station

The wall can be seen in the enlarged photo below:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7d/Aerial_San_Onofre_Generating_Station_May_2012.JPG


15 posted on 07/25/2013 7:49:34 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson