Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If Trayvon Were Pakistani… (Why Isn't Obama Outraged About a Drone War Based on Profiling?)
Foreign Policy ^ | JULY 22, 2013 | MICAH ZENKO

Posted on 07/23/2013 12:09:11 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Why isn't Obama outraged about a drone war based on profiling?

President Barack Obama surprised the White House press corps on Friday when he preempted the normal daily briefing to offer his unscripted ideas on the Trayvon Martin case.

Obama departed from his usual reluctance to talk publicly about his personal experience with racial bias, reminding viewers that African-American men -- including him, before he became a senator -- experience prejudice based only on their appearance, not their personality or behavior. He added that the African-American community was interpreting the outcome of the case through a "set of experiences and a history that doesn't go away." And he noted that, while the African-American community is not naïve about violence involving its young men -- they are "disproportionately both victims and perpetrators" -- that fact is no excuse for different treatment under the law.

It is striking to compare Obama's deliberate and thoughtful commentary about the tragic killing of Trayvon Martin with the military tactic that will forever characterize his presidency: killing people with drones. The president posits that it is wrong to profile individuals based upon their appearance, associations, or statistical propensity to violence. By extension, he believes that, just because those characteristics may seem threatening to some, the use of lethal force cannot be justified as self-defense unless there are reasonable grounds to fear imminent bodily harm. But that very kind of profiling and a broad interpretation of what constitutes a threat are the foundational principles of U.S. "signature strikes" -- the targeted killings of unidentified military-age males.

The use of signature strikes began in early 2008, when "instead of having to confirm the identity of a suspected militant leader before attacking," the New York Times reported, drones were permitted to "strike convoys of vehicles that bear the characteristics of

(Excerpt) Read more at foreignpolicy.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: droningaboutdrones; pakistan; randsconcerntrolls; waronterror
Wow, read this whole thing.
1 posted on 07/23/2013 12:09:11 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

because he’s targeting Christian and non-Islamist Pakistanis for drone attack. Obama only cares about CRIMINALS. Those are his fellows!


2 posted on 07/23/2013 12:21:06 PM PDT by Wanderer99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
reminding viewers that African-American men -- including him, before he became a senator -- experience prejudice based only on their appearance, not their personality or behavior.

What a moronic statement. Meet a man in a dark alley and you're supposed to judge whether you're in danger by his personality? What can you possibly know about it?

What can you base your judgment on other than appearance?

3 posted on 07/23/2013 12:21:50 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I’d also like to point out that males, as a group, are profiled far most strictly than blacks. The male/female disproportion in prisons is much greater than the black/white one, relative to percentage of population.

Yet this profiling and discriminatory punishment doesn’t seem to bother anyone.

Possibly that’s because most of us recognize men commit most of the crime, especially violent crime, so it’s reasonable more of us will be in prison. For some reason, when race is the factor rather than sex, lots of us can’t reach the same logical conclusion.


4 posted on 07/23/2013 12:24:23 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wanderer99

Huh?

There are hardly any Christians in Pakistan, and the last place they would live are in areas such as the FATA or the tribal areas.

Most are clustered in Karachi, Islamabad or in the rural areas of Punjab


5 posted on 07/23/2013 1:22:29 PM PDT by MadIsh32 (In order to be pro-market, sometimes you must be anti-big business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIsh32

Well Obama is probably hoping to hit one or two regardless...


6 posted on 07/23/2013 6:08:10 PM PDT by Wanderer99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson