I heard a breathless reporter on the news today saying something about the baby was displayed to his “future subjects”. Boy did that irk me. If those people consider themselves “subjects” of this inbred offspring of worthless pukes, then they deserve their subjugation. I am so glad my ancestors left that kind of thinking centuries ago. It has been bred out of my people, the Americans (a remnant community) but they are trying to get us to think like that again. Our new monarch is intended to be Government. By God, I will die first.
I feel sorry for your lack of knowledge, and the obvious lack of desire to learn more.
WHO are “your people?” How long have they been in the US of A? And where did they come from and when?
Your arrogance puts the Royals to shame.
King obamaumao I who by some internal holy writ of the great unwashed uniformed third world which is used to living under tyranny, proclaims to these same unwashed that he will go around Congress (the representatives of the People), and the Court too. To bypass the other branches of our government designed to check the power of the other.
A petty stupid tyrant, with narcissistic delusions of his own intellect— which is 3rd rate. Indeed “the State, always the State” is NOT an American concept— it is Old Europe, and that did not go well the first time.
They (we) don't, I can assure you. Don't jump to conclusions from the breathless improvisation of a single reporter. The term 'subject' has long disappeared from general use, is no longer applied to the status of British citizens, and has no meaning in law. The only context you will ever hear it used nowadays is in the pantomime flummery of some formal state occasions, where the language used is as archaic and irrelevant to modern Britain as the fancy-dress costumes.
Incidentally, it's curious that the notion that the royal family is 'inbred' seems so persistent among American commentators. In fact the British royal family has practised exogamy more consistently and for longer than many, perhaps most ordinary families. It's a very long time since a British monarch married anybody as close as a first cousin.