So that gives Roberts the right to rewrite it from the bench, or fix it, and not just throw it out ?
He didn’t rewrite it. He didn’t add a single line, he didn’t delete a single line.
He ruled that the law was constitutional under the taxing power. That is the same justification given when the SCOTUS approved Social Security as a tax.
That means that as a tax, it can be repealed with a mere 50% vote in house and senate (with presidential approval), rather than requiring the 60 votes for cloture in the Senate.