Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote
From the article: The amounts the fish carried were minuscule — far less, ounce for ounce, than the amount of naturally occurring radiation in a banana — but possibly enough for scientists to gain insight into animal migration, the team wrote in their report.

Stop your silly scare-mongering.

31 posted on 07/23/2013 6:01:30 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: 1010RD

You know that there is no comparison, medically, between the radiation in a banana (radioactive potassium) and the radiation detected in fish, right?
The radiation in a banana is harmless, the body can handle it. The radiation in the fish is not harmless and the human body will not handle it the same way.
Further that was just a few months after the Fukushima disaster - they have continued to flush radioactive waste into the ocean nonstop. ALso, there are 700 structures filled with radioactive water on the Fukushima site, they are not earthquake sound and currently contain very high amounts of radioactive water - if they fail in an earthquake, all that will go into the ocean too.


37 posted on 07/23/2013 11:16:34 AM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson