Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tepco now admits radioactive water entering the sea at Fukushima No. 1 (Japan)
Japan Times ^ | 07/22/2013 | Jiji

Posted on 07/22/2013 9:19:23 PM PDT by TexGrill

Fukushima nuclear plant operator Tepco on Monday admitted for the first time that radioactive groundwater is flowing into the sea, fueling fears that marine life is being poisoned.

The admission came a day after voters handed the largely pro-nuclear Liberal Democratic Party of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe — and ally New Komeito — a handsome majority in the Upper House.

Earlier this month, Tokyo Electric Power Co. said groundwater samples taken at the battered plant showed that levels of cesium-134 had shot up more than 110 times in a few days.

Although unable to explain the increased readings, Tepco had nevertheless maintained the toxic groundwater was likely being contained, largely by concrete foundations and steel sheets.

“But now we believe that contaminated water has flowed out to the sea,” a Tepco spokesman said Monday.

However, the spokesman insisted the impact of the radioactive water on the ocean would be limited. “Seawater data have shown no abnormal rise in the levels of radioactivity.”

Tetsu Nozaki, chairman of Fukushima Prefectural Federation of Fisheries Co-operative Associations, voiced deep concern.

“It was quite shocking,” he told NHK. “(Tepco’s) explanation is totally different from the one in the past.”

(Excerpt) Read more at japantimes.co.jp ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fukushima; japaneconomy; radioactivewater; tepco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Global business tip
1 posted on 07/22/2013 9:19:23 PM PDT by TexGrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TexGrill

What is the risk to humans? How far can a toxic level spread?
Do radioactive fish glow in the dark?


2 posted on 07/22/2013 9:23:30 PM PDT by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexGrill

Is this the origin of Pacific caught fish in American grocery stores or is the Pacific caught fish from China seas?


3 posted on 07/22/2013 9:23:53 PM PDT by stars & stripes forever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexGrill
Hello Godzilla


4 posted on 07/22/2013 9:24:44 PM PDT by Bullish (Psalm 46)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexGrill

Looked like my fish had been cooked twice lately...


5 posted on 07/22/2013 9:28:17 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

Yup. Blue Oyster Cult once told of his coming.... But today, too many are watching American Idle to heed their sage warning.


6 posted on 07/22/2013 9:38:03 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

7 posted on 07/22/2013 9:42:10 PM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

Hey can you head over to the memorial and clear out the Super mutants? I’ll head up to the commonwealth and fetch the good doctor. I think we’re gonna need her.

/Fallout ping


8 posted on 07/22/2013 9:44:38 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlexW
yo
9 posted on 07/22/2013 9:49:26 PM PDT by 867V309
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

I’d forget about eating anything that comes from Japan. Or from the Pacific Ocean for that matter. Hail and farewell, Alaskan salmon. Alas, I knew you well.


10 posted on 07/22/2013 9:51:37 PM PDT by Veto! (Opinions freely expressed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexGrill

No duh.


11 posted on 07/22/2013 9:52:20 PM PDT by piytar (The predator-class is furious that their prey are shooting back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

What is the risk to humans?
It doesn’t matter. No matter how toxic releases of radioactive wastes are, the nuclear industry and it’s insurer (the government) always specify “no immediate risk to human health.” Even if people are still suffering and dying in the Chernobyl area and regions removed from there....the official story is “no harm to human health” whenever someone asks.

How far can a toxic level spread?

Around the world eventually. Tuna caught off the coast of Fukushima can end up in your dinner table because fish swim and we import goods from around the world.

Do radioactive fish glow in the dark?

No - they look like non radioactive fish unless they had time to develop lesions in their flesh from exposure. International research vessels in the waters of Japan captured fish which looked normal but had high levels of radiation in the flesh. The food chain doesn’t help - small contaminated fish eaten by larger fish eaten by ...well....tuna and other commercial catch. Fukushima is a massive experiment on a global scale - we have never seen this amount of radiation dumped directly into the ocean - the threat of harm to wildlife and humans comes from research but never on this scale.


12 posted on 07/22/2013 9:53:05 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: Veto!

I’d forget about eating anything that comes from Japan.


Fish from their west coast would probably be okay.


14 posted on 07/22/2013 9:54:14 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals don't get it. Their minds are diseased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

Will the mainland sewer glow in the dark and light up North Korea? That could confuse the NSA.


15 posted on 07/22/2013 9:56:35 PM PDT by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

Radio active fish do not glow in the dark. To test for radio activity in fish you have to use a blue or yellow LED light (available at Radio Shack). To check the fish it is best to place it on a white platter or all white surface. The neutral white color is necessary to the test. Any other color surface and the test is not reliable. To test you turn out the lights in the house and then move the blue or yellow LED across the fish. If any radio activity is present it will appear as light green specks in the fish. Obviously this test is performed on the meat of the fish, not on the scales of the fish. Most fish that is contaminated will have minimal radiation presents so any green specks may be hard to see but if present will be visible over the entire area of the fish meat and never concentrated in one area of the fish. I’ve only tested one fish that showed very visible green specks which I ultimately made me wonder how it passed government inspections using a much more sophisticated version of this simple home test technology.


16 posted on 07/22/2013 9:57:49 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience. It is a guide to your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

None! Buy a banana, same radiation.

One if the few things Rush said that made me question him. Seriously .


17 posted on 07/22/2013 10:00:20 PM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to thoe tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

I’d bet that all the food Rush eats is organic.


18 posted on 07/22/2013 10:03:23 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals don't get it. Their minds are diseased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Veto!

Silly Luddite.

It isn’t going to harm any west coast fisheries. If that be the case, we’d have no Salmon due to all the nuke testing before, during and long after WWII in the Pacifc Ocean.


19 posted on 07/22/2013 10:10:36 PM PDT by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

I was being facetious about fish glowing in the dark.
Yes, it is logical to know that people around Chernobyl, as well as Fukushima might be affected from radiation.
I do not, however, think that dangerous Fukushima radiation is going to migrate around the world via sea water.


20 posted on 07/22/2013 10:12:32 PM PDT by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson