Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nero Germanicus

I’m not speaking about Obama. I am speaking about a principle.

A court ruling re Obama has no bearing on the principle discussed.


400 posted on 07/25/2013 12:26:43 PM PDT by Ray76 (Common sense immigration reform: Enforce Existing Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies ]


To: Ray76

Where a constitutional principle is not specifically spelled out, court rulings are used to interpret meanings. In America, the concept of natural born citizenship has relevance to the election of presidents and vice-presidents.

There is a biblical principle: “Thou shalt not kill.” Yet all kinds of contingencies and exceptions have emerged to that basic principle over the millennia. One such modern day exception is “justifiable homicide,” a LEGAL principle.

Minor v. Happersett (1874): “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that.”


402 posted on 07/25/2013 1:00:26 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson