FogBlower, all you are doing is showing the duplicity and the cowardice from the bench. Never get to discovery with them no matter what. And besides, Taitz fumbles and stumbles about in court and why FogNut Obots give Taitz all of their affection.
The point was that judges appointed by both liberal and conservative presidents have rejected and dismissed eligibility lawsuits going back to 2008.
Those folks who are disappointed in a decision always blame the judge for ruling incorrectly. That goes with the territory but under our system, a bad decision by any one judge can be overturned on appeal at the U.S. Court of Appeals or by the Supreme Court of the United States, so any single judge’s ruling is always subject to review by a higher court with more judges involved.
At least some of the blame for the lack of discovery in eligibility cases must be laid at the feet of attorneys on the “Obama is ineligible” side. Discovery is MUCH easier to achieve in criminal actions. Serious crimes such as forgery, government document tampering, identity theft, election fraud and felony fraud have been alleged and yet not one CRIMINAL investigation has been launched by any prosecutor anywhere in America. It is the responsibility of attorneys alleging crimes to convince both law enforcement and prosecuting attorneys to pursue official (not volunteer) investigations.