Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway

He is NOT eligible. What part of Canada don’t you understand?


7 posted on 07/21/2013 2:08:49 PM PDT by faucetman ( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: faucetman

Yes, he is.


9 posted on 07/21/2013 2:10:28 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: faucetman
He is NOT eligible. What part of Canada don’t you understand?

I believe that clause of the Constitution has been waived. It seems than no one in the whole gosh-darned US of A has standing to challenge anything.

11 posted on 07/21/2013 2:12:25 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Unindicted Co-conspirators: The Mainstream Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: faucetman
He is NOT eligible. What part of Canada Kenya don’t you understand?

Fixed it.

12 posted on 07/21/2013 2:12:58 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the mainland US There'd be a rifle behind each blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: faucetman

Canada is not Kenya.

Cruz’s father had aspirations to become an American and did so while Ted was very young.

And Cuba was at one time a protectorate of the United States.

Cruz is qualified.


15 posted on 07/21/2013 2:16:25 PM PDT by Wellington VII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: faucetman
Yes, Ted Cruz is eligible under multiple parts of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

From the Department of State website:

Birth Abroad to One Citizen and One Alien Parent in Wedlock

"A child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) of the INA provided the U.S. citizen parent was physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for the time period required by the law applicable at the time of the child's birth. (For birth on or after November 14, 1986, a period of five years physical presence, two after the age of fourteen, is required. For birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen, is required for physical presence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child.) The U.S. citizen parent must be genetically related to the child to transmit U.S. citizenship."

Ted Cruz was born on 12 Dec 1970, and attended school in the United States, so this requirement is satisfied, provided that the parents were married at the time.

But now let's play the hypothetical that he was born out-of-wedlock. What does the law say about that?

Birth Abroad Out-of-Wedlock to a U.S. Citizen Mother: "A person born abroad out-of-wedlock to a U.S. citizen mother may acquire U.S. citizenship under Section 309(c) of the INA if the mother was a U.S. citizen at the time of the person’s birth and if the mother was physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the person’s birth. The mother must be genetically related to the person in order to transmit U.S. citizenship."

So in this case, Cruz acquires US citizenship at birth under Section 301(c) of the INA.

27 posted on 07/21/2013 2:34:20 PM PDT by UAConservative (We have just begun to fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: faucetman

Eligibility Schmeligibility. /spit


33 posted on 07/21/2013 2:58:06 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: faucetman; All
one of my granddaughters was born in the west Indies, while her father was working there - she carries DUEL citizenship, automatically.

Ever hear of that?

Canada also has duel citizenship.

A DIL was born in Italy - her mother Italian, her father retired Amer. Army. She holds duel citizenship - automatically - but didn't even know it until she applied for a visa to come here last year and was denied - told she didn't NEED a visa as she was already a citizen.

So how about we tone down the ‘forget about Cruz’ right out of the gate. Let's not eat our own - FOR ONCE. and once we get a candidate - let's not rip them to shreds, like we did Romney. Let's set aside our omniscient intelligence and get the enemies out of power.

39 posted on 07/21/2013 3:09:31 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (Christian is as Christian does - by their fruits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: faucetman

What part of Kenya don’t you understand. If Obama is eligible, anyone is.


57 posted on 07/21/2013 3:55:19 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: faucetman

So far I like Cruz and his politics but I will not vote for him to be POTUSA. I cannot discard my belief that the Constitution makes specifically/deliberately a different recognition of ‘natural born citizen’ and just plain ‘citizen’. According to some people just being born in the USA makes a person eligible for POTUSA. In such a situation the two sons of the Muslim ex President Morsi of Egypt would be eligible by being born in the USA. I believe the Founders of our Nation were very concerned about such a situation and even more so about a a Muslim becoming POTUSA. An then there is this news about a black lady minister in Alabama saying Obama is eligible for POTUSA because he is married to a bona fide USA citizen. When the eligibility for POTUSA goes out of bounds of the Constitution it is necessary to look closely for the reason/purpose of being out of bounds.


62 posted on 07/21/2013 4:02:37 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: faucetman
"What part of Canada don’t you understand?"

The part that Canada was where his American mother had Cruz, and therefore making Cruz eligible for the Presidency. If the SCOTUS takes it; they will find Cruz eligible, and I will not be "understanding that part of Canada" all the way to the voting booth with a Cruz for President bumper sticker!

85 posted on 07/21/2013 4:58:58 PM PDT by celmak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: faucetman
[Article]
There’s been some more buzz this week about Ted Cruz’s presidential prospects.

He is NOT eligible. What part of Canada don’t you understand?


Correcto. His "prospects" are nil, zero. He is Article II ineligible.

Note to self: See how liberals and Progs (Stalinists) amend the Constitution, by ignoring it?

106 posted on 07/21/2013 11:19:44 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: faucetman
He is NOT eligible. What part of Canada don’t you understand?

Tell us how you will handle it if he ends up on the ballot and the choice is between him and Hillary or another Freedom destroyer....

Enquiring minds want to know.

110 posted on 07/22/2013 3:29:43 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson