To the Police:
To you these tactics seem good and just, Why? Because you want to go home to your family at night. To us the citizens of the United States they are terroristic in nature and deed.
Now I want the police to think about something: What if the Criminals say; “Hey this works for the PO-PO and the suckers, (I mean citizen), allow it then let’s do the same thing Man! Just yell police when we bust in and them when the suckers drop their weapons and hit the floor we can blast them!”
The natural reaction once that becomes the normal ‘home invasion’ tactic is to get the heaviest rifle you can afford and just start blasting through the door at the ‘home invaders’ Badged or not. Why? Because I have to sleep at night knowing that I did the best to defend my family from the criminals who posed as police to invade my home.
Stand your ground laws or not. Your HOME is your Castle and you have the natural right to defend it however you can,
Here is another for you to do what you do best.
She and he were very fortunate that they were not shot full of holes and killed. When they were on the air, America’s Most Wanted did a segment on a guy his survivors suspect was murdered by killers wearing law enforcement uniforms to gain admittance on his boat [the incident occurred on the Atlantic Ocean] but that aside, there have been many instances where criminals wore law enforcement uniforms to gain entrance to the scene of what later became a murder site.
We used to call this FELONY KIDNAPPING, See OJ in Vegas. The jack booted thug belongs in PRISON.
Goldsberry wasn't arrested or shot despite pointing a gun at a cop, so Wiggins said, “She sure shouldn't be going to the press.”
The woman looks out her kitchen window, and sees someone in military garb lasering her with his weapon. Her reaction is to scream and seek self-protection.
The officer takes offense that she would have the audacity to point a gun at him, but he has had one on her from the start.
There was no warrant for this specific home. The suspect was thought to be in the apartment complex. Pardon me, but who in their right mind makes a charge that broad, and what police agency in their right mind takes action based on that broad statement.
Here was a situation where the officer could have killed the armed woman perfectly within her legal right to self-preservation.
Nowhere does this police miscreant express the realization that what he had done, had caused this unacceptable threat to decent law-abiding citizens.
She's lucky I didn't shoot her? This dude is one seriously f--ked up asshole. He knows what he has a right to do, and hasn't a clue what he should do with that right.
Some of those officers were pulled in as backup. They didn't even know the whole story. Those that did, should be summarily dismissed.
I'm all for capturing people who harm children. I'm all for firing people who come within moments of killing innocent citizens too.
This sort of thing is inexcusable.
It was a home invasion. No warrant.
Here is the fellow they were looking for. It is a rape/incest case that was accused of occurring over several years and also involved what appears to be a younger brother.
The accused has been convicted of a number of crimes of receiving stolen property.
Sarasotan, 24, sought on sexual battery charges
http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20130716/ARTICLE/130719744?tc=ar
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/23/ready-how-watertown-door-to-door-search-for-bombing-suspects-did-not-violate-the-fourth-amendment/
**“voluntary” and “consent” apparently don’t mean what I think they do.** warrant? What warrant?
Tyranny, pure and simple. Our Founding Father are flipping in their graves.Who will be the first martyr standing their ground?