Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the_Watchman

What source claims 18 Billion as technically recoverable?


19 posted on 07/19/2013 2:01:12 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: thackney; the_Watchman; Teacher317

81 years...do I have 100? 100? Anyone going for 100? 81 years...going once...going twice.....


21 posted on 07/19/2013 2:03:27 PM PDT by henkster (The 0bama regime isn't a train wreck, it's a B 17 raid on the rail yard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

I was taking a figure purported to come from the state of North Dakota in this paper: http://www.nd.gov/ndic/ic-press/bakken-form-06.pdf

The paper was cited in a Wikipedia article. Now that I have read the article, I’m not sure where they got “18 Billion”. Some figures from the paper are far higher.

The estimates for the amount of oil in the ground range all over the map. Furthermore, the estimates of how much is recoverable also range from 1% to 50%.

The price of oil actually factors into the equation. If crude prices increase, then the amount recoverable will also increase since marginal methods will be developed and employed with greater economic rewards.

See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bakken_formation


25 posted on 07/19/2013 2:27:08 PM PDT by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson