She was talking about methodology, doncha know. ooohh - Red Herring mention which I nailed Elijah on from the get go today.
Good question.
Why are they being called “Tea Party Cases”? If they were predominantly Progressive groups, would they not have a label of “Progressive Cases”?
That in itself shows the bias as to what the IRS themselves deemed as who was being targeted and not....they named it specifically after the Tea Party because that was the majority of groups being targeted.
And didn’t the IRS already ADMIT and CONFESS that they did this? So why are we going over what they’ve already admitted to? Isn’t this supposed to find out WHO it is tied to and how far up it went? Am I missing something, re: this line of questioning?