Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick
A child with a life-threatening problem has a much better chance of survival if it’s identified before birth.

For this purpose, I agree. We told the doctors that they are welcome to perform any tests that might help them to treat mom or baby during pregnancy, birth, or any time following that.
15 posted on 07/17/2013 3:39:50 PM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Sopater

Since many children with Down’s also have heart defects, a good case can be made that you want to know about it in advance. I did not, even in my 40s, have any tests other than ultrasound, but if the “level 2” ultrasound I had at 45 had showed indications for Down’s, we would have pursued additional testing that would help us deal with the baby’s particular physical issues.


24 posted on 07/17/2013 5:55:20 PM PDT by Tax-chick (No pun intended, no punishment ... If I offended you, you needed it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson