To: Tax-chick
A child with a life-threatening problem has a much better chance of survival if its identified before birth.
For this purpose, I agree. We told the doctors that they are welcome to perform any tests that might help them to treat mom or baby during pregnancy, birth, or any time following that.
15 posted on
07/17/2013 3:39:50 PM PDT by
Sopater
(Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
To: Sopater
Since many children with Down’s also have heart defects, a good case can be made that you want to know about it in advance. I did not, even in my 40s, have any tests other than ultrasound, but if the “level 2” ultrasound I had at 45 had showed indications for Down’s, we would have pursued additional testing that would help us deal with the baby’s particular physical issues.
24 posted on
07/17/2013 5:55:20 PM PDT by
Tax-chick
(No pun intended, no punishment ... If I offended you, you needed it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson