The fact that there were "a thousand or so" FBI agents and a spec ops helicopter milling about early the very next morning in Moriches, NY tells me there was information and people knowledgeable about that information that were there to insure a cover-up would be as possible as it was necessary, as perceived by those in-the-know.
It's hard to imagine a stink greater than in the hangar where the plane pieces were puzzled together, but it surely looks as though the FBI out-stank that.
Clinton surely knew, and it seemed there was prior knowledge that prepositioned certain Navy vessels in that locale that evening.
This cover-up is so contrary to what our government ought to be doing!
Was it Al-Qaeda? Was it a Navy accident that necessitated an EO to silence those naval personnel? (Are there no Snowdens among those Navy personnel?) Have we been paying a ransom to Middle East interests for more than a decade? We'll not know the truth so long as we've got such a totally mendacious group of government liars.
HF
I remember Rush Limbaugh having Kallstrom on his show in 96 and 97, and Rush stood up for this guy as being a paragon of justice and virtue. Rush lost all credibility with me on Kallstrom. Having ZERO eyewitness testimonials at NTSB and congressional hearings, and Kallstrom demeaning the hundreds of eyewitness reports leaves me unbelievably outraged.
If you are trying to pull off a cover-up, it's a bad plan to have "a thousand or so" federal employees involved. There are books to be written, you know. And it only takes one out of a thousand or so.