Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: highball

All of this is sounding like approval of gay marriage on the part of those who make such claims, I hope you realize.

A monarchy by definition cannot be apolitical—it’s the head of state. The practice of royal assent is certainly not apolitical. And no, reserve powers if used do not break the compact with the nation—passing gay marriage does, however.


91 posted on 07/17/2013 6:02:16 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai

The monarchy exists in the UK for one reason.....tourism.


92 posted on 07/17/2013 6:03:08 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

No, no, no. My telling you that you’re wrong about the UK’s political system does not mean I’m in any way in support of this stupid bill.

The Queen’s role in government is ceremonial, not active. The royal family is only allowed to hold on to their position is because they stay out of politics. Otherwise the country would have kicked them out years ago.

There’s a reason no sovereign has withheld royal assent in three hundred years, and it’s not because they thought every bill was a great idea.

I’m sympathetic to what you’re saying, but the outrage is properly directed against the politicians - PM, ministers, MPs - who passed it. Not with the Queen obligated to rubber-stamp what they give her. Save your venom for the people who deserve it.


94 posted on 07/17/2013 6:59:54 PM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson