Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai
The UK’s monarch also can withhold said assent, equivalent to a presidential veto; this is one of the monarch’s reserve powers.

Technically, perhaps. But not in practice.

To do so would create a constitutional crisis, end the monarchy and tear apart the government. Which makes it utterly unlike a presidential veto.

I don't like this either, but it's not on the Queen's head. It's on the head of the PM and all the MPs who voted for it.
80 posted on 07/17/2013 2:20:47 PM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: highball

Withholding of royal assent is not an automatic trigger of a new election; but in this case, this government would deserve it, I have to say.

Current practice is not precedent, neither is it law; the reserve powers are the law.


81 posted on 07/17/2013 2:27:31 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson