Thank you for your defense of gay marriage. The oath is clearer than Bagehot’s opinions (who unfortunately like Cameron, used both epithets “conservative” and “liberal” to describe himself).
My defence of gay marriage? When my last post spoke of ‘the grievous consequences of this measure if enacted’? Is that risible riposte the best you can come up with? Disappointing - your arguments up to that point had some cogency, before you descended to that level of puerility.
What’s unfortunate about this discussion is its focus on the Queen rather than those actually responsible for all this.