Skip to comments.
Trayvon Martin: A Child, or a Thug Wannabe?
The New American ^
| 15 July 2013
| Jack Kerwick, Ph.D.
Posted on 07/16/2013 10:32:14 PM PDT by VitacoreVision
It is Trayvon Martin, no one else, who has put the lie to the notion that he was some innocent child.
Trayvon Martin: A Child, or a Thug Wannabe?
The New American
15 July 2013
George Zimmerman has been acquitted in the shooting death of "the child," the "young boy," Trayvon Martin.
As should go without saying, it is of course a tragedy that our world is such that it regularly claims human life. It is particularly tragic when young people, like Martin, lose their lives in circumstances that could have so easily been avoided.
But Martin was no "child." He was not yet a legal adult, but at 17 years of age he could, with a parents permission, kill and die for the United States military. And 17-year-olds, particularly when they are six feet tall, intoxicated on drugs, and physically fit, as was Martin, can and do kill and die in the streets of America.
Yet it isn't just Zimmerman's persecutors who are fond of sanitizing Martin's character.
Writing for Front Page magazine, Arnold Ahlert castigates his fellow conservatives for acting badly.
In "Framing Trayvon," Ahlert contends that "many conservatives" have engaged in a "demonization campaign" against Martin -- or "Trayvon," as Ahlert calls him -- that runs "parallel" to that promoted against Zimmerman by such "racial arsonists" as Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. Conservatives "have hastily embraced caricatures of Trayvon Martin, painting him as a vicious street thug who deserved his fate."
Ahlert insists that Martin sounded like "little more than a rambunctious teenager" whose family and friends describe as "a fine young man," "warm and funny," and "a standout athlete with an enormous appetite."
Where do we begin?
First, Ahlert is correct that, from day one, the racial arsonists did indeed rush to demonize Zimmerman. Yet he fails to so much as hint at the fact that the demonization of Zimmerman demanded the idealization of Martin. By now, everyone whos paid any attention to this case is all too familiar with the medias tireless juxtaposition of Zimmermans mug shots alongside the outdated pictures of a prepubescent Martin.
Had Ahlert mentioned this, it would immediately become clear that it isnt conservatives, but Martin who supplied us with a negative caricature of Martin. More accurately, as details emerged since February of 2012, time has exploded the idyllic caricature of Martin that the anti-racists have labored to embed in the popular imagination. The Martin who had that fateful encounter with Zimmerman was a far cry from the sixth-grader whose photograph was plastered all over the media for months after the shooting. As Ahlert himself admits, at the time of his death, Martin used foul language, made obscene gestures on camera, probably smoked marijuana, and engaged in other troublesome teenage behavior like getting caught with possession of what was likely stolen jewelry, getting repeatedly suspended from school, and attempting to assault a bus driver.
This brings us to a second point.
Neither conservatives nor anyone else has made Martin out to be a vicious thug, as Ahlert says. What the record shows is that he was a thug of a sort, a thug wannabe, if you will. At the very least, he was thuggish, even if he may not have been a full-blown thug.
And we know this, not just from his record, but solely from the fact that he unleashed a torrent of violence upon Zimmerman.
No one credibly disputes that Martin threw the first punch. From what has been determined, it was he who threw every other punch after that as well. To be clear, there was no exchange of blows between Martin and Zimmerman. Rather, Zimmerman was on his back as Martin repeatedly pounded on him.
And it is not as if Zimmerman was in his face posing an imminent danger to Martin. Had this been the case, then perhaps the latter would have been justified in launching a preemptive punch (even if he would not have been justified in punching his face into the ground after he had succeeded in knocking him down).
Had Martin really feared for his life when he noticed that Zimmerman had been following him, and had he conducted himself in a non-thuggish way, then he would have done what Zimmerman did when he first observed Martin: call the authorities. Martin couldve ended his phone call with Rachel Jeantel to whom he referred to Zimmerman as a creepy a** cracker and called the police.
Instead, he chose to lie in wait for Zimmerman before jumping him.
This is the official account of the events of that fateful evening when Martins life ended an account that the jury in Florida accepted and that no one has been able to contradict.
Contra Ahlert, to acknowledge these facts is not to say that Martin deserved to be killed. Much less has anyone, least of all the conservatives whom Ahlert lectures, even remotely insinuated that Martin deserved to be killed because of his lifestyle.
However, to concede the facts is to concede both that Martin did indeed act thuggishly and that Zimmerman was just as justified in shooting him as an elderly woman would be justified in shooting an assailant who had her pinned on the ground while striking her.
Though painful, we mustnt lose sight of the realities of this issue even if the Zimmerman haters, including some alleged conservatives, insist upon calling them caricatures.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: justicefortrayvon; trayvonmartin; zimmermantrial
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
To: VitacoreVision
2
posted on
07/16/2013 10:37:28 PM PDT
by
goodnesswins
(R.I.P. Doherty, Smith, Stevens, Woods.)
To: VitacoreVision
It appears that Martin decided that being followed by a gay man was legitimate provocation for a brutal assault.
3
posted on
07/16/2013 10:37:53 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: VitacoreVision
More like a young man versus a child. So, why do they disrespect him; it is very telling/and a disconnect to reality to do so. He certainly was not guided by his parents nor school instructors, or his friends well enough because he had a pattern of issues at school. He was being moved back and forth from parent to parent which didn’t help stability for him.
I am sorry he lost his life but you don’t go around attacking people because people react differently. I understand that he had been removed from school and had a incident with his bus driver. While in Sanford, he was already angry upset.
To: BenLurkin
True.
Trayvon Martin attacked a man he thought was gay. This sounds like a Hate Crime to me. He also stereotyped gays as rapists.
To: VitacoreVision
I know people want to portray him as a megaHitler, but to be, his facebook page suggests and everything suggest he was a wannabe and a wimp.
To: VitacoreVision
The leftist claim. and Ahlert’s, is that it was Zimmerman’s duty to take whatever Martin chose to dish out to him, even unto death, because Martin was black and Zimmerman is not. The drive here is to establish as principle of law that no white man is legally justified in defending himself against a black man, regardless of circumstances.
7
posted on
07/16/2013 10:46:22 PM PDT
by
arthurus
(Read Hazlitt's EcomT"ics In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/econohttp://www.fee.org/library/det)
To: VitacoreVision
In "Framing Trayvon," Ahlert contends that "many conservatives" have engaged in a "demonization campaign" against Martin -- or "Trayvon," as Ahlert calls him -- that runs "parallel" to that promoted against Zimmerman by such "racial arsonists" as Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. Conservatives "have hastily embraced caricatures of Trayvon Martin, painting him as a vicious street thug who deserved his fate."The cold hard truth is, do people really want to be just like Sharpton or Jackson on the other side?
To: VitacoreVision
I have been waiting for the multi-millionaire record label owners and music producers who have profiting from pushing the gangsta lifestyle on youths like Martin to stand up and take responsibility for his death and the deaths of so many in the black community.
Waiting...
Still waiting...
To: goodnesswins
It isnt clear yet?????Good question. Trayvon's Twitter handle was "No Limit Nigga", and he tweeted about manufacturing his own drugs. Factor in the fighting, stealing, guns, and other clues and that's a thug wannabe if one ever was one.
10
posted on
07/16/2013 10:48:30 PM PDT
by
South40
To: VitacoreVision
The correct answer is violent criminal.
11
posted on
07/16/2013 10:51:24 PM PDT
by
chris37
(Heartless.)
To: VitacoreVision
The problem has been the focus on irrelevant arguments some of which are actually unsupported by the evidence.
1. GZ racially profiled TM There is no evidence of this.
2. GZ disobeyed an order by the police * The civilian dispatcher, Sean Noffke, testified that he did not give GZ an order and, in fact, he, like his fellow dispatchers, are trained not make comments that sound like commands. * Noffke also testified under cross that, as a result of his asking GZ which way TM was going, GZ could have reasonably interpreted this as being asked to follow Martin. * It is also not a crime in Florida to disregard a comment made by a civilian dispatcher.
3. GZ got out of his car Not a crime on public property and not negligent either.
4. GZ followed TM Again, anyone can follow anyone on a public street unless the followee has obtained a restraining order against the follower and even there, the RS only places time, place, and manner restrictions on the person enjoined.
5. GZ wasnt really injured * Under Floridas self-defense laws, one doesnt have to be injured AT ALL to use deadly force * No one is required to refrain from defending himself while another is engaged in or attempting to commit a felony.
6. TM is dead through no fault of his own * If you believe that TM assaulted GZ, then he IS dead as a result of his own actions.
7. GZ could have left * Under Florida law, there is not a duty to withdraw rather than use deadly force * TM was straddling GZ so how the latter was supposed to leave the scene is unanswered.
8. GZ was armed and TM wasnt * Ones fists can be considered weapons and can result in severe bodily harm or death.
* GZ was legally carrying a weapon * There is no requirement under the law that the same weapon be used by the assailant * A homeowner can kill an intruder whether or not he has been threatened * Those that attack cannot feign surprise if they are met with superior firepower.
9. Stand Your Ground! * SYG is NOT at issue in this trial. * The defense is a classic self-defense case.
10. Black men NEVER get to use SYG! * Wrong http://tinyurl.com/nboht35
11. GZ is a man and TM was a boy! * As if boys dont commit murder, rape, and assault everyday in this country.
12
posted on
07/16/2013 10:51:35 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(You can't invade the mainland US There'd be a rifle behind each blade of grass.)
To: VitacoreVision
Trayvon Martin attacked a man he thought was gay. This sounds like a Hate Crime to me. He also stereotyped gays as rapists.I think it was Showandtell who made that identification.
13
posted on
07/16/2013 10:51:49 PM PDT
by
arthurus
(Read Hazlitt's EcomT"ics In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/econohttp://www.fee.org/library/det)
To: VitacoreVision
Zimmerman had a broken nose and bruises to his face, and lacerations and bruises on the back of his head.
Zimmerman also had grass stains on his back and the back of his legs.
Martin, OTOH, had grass stains on his knees, and had only two injuries. Scraped knuckles, and the single bullet wound that killed him.
It is clear what happened. And so it is time that we removed this lie:
And replaced it with the truth:
But with the race baiting, hate America, get "whitey," crowd, the truth of what happened does not matter. Advancing their goal of "fundamentally changing" America is all that matters.
One thing...for once, Obama actually got it right. Now that we know so much more about Trayvon, it is true...if Obama had a boy, hhe would have been just like Trayvon.
ZIMMERMAN NOT GUILTY!
To: VitacoreVision
Good looking kid, appears he turned bad last couple years.
Sad
15
posted on
07/16/2013 10:53:23 PM PDT
by
Java4Jay
(The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
3. GZ got out of his car Not a crime on public property and not negligent either.That may not have even been "public" property in a gated community.
16
posted on
07/16/2013 10:55:19 PM PDT
by
arthurus
(Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/econohttp://www.fee.org/library/det)
To: VitacoreVision
17
posted on
07/16/2013 10:58:15 PM PDT
by
Cyman
To: VitacoreVision
"a standout athlete with an enormous appetite."One of the first thoughts that occurred to me, when this first erupted onto the national scene, was this; Trayvon Martin played varsity football, right? When the meme of 'fine young man senselessly gunned down started, I withheld from forming any opinion one way, or the other, and just waited to see if a certain 'dog' 'barked' or not. That 'dog' was any college chiming in that they had been scouting this young man for inclusion into their football program, and were saddened by the loss of his potential to their program.
The 'dog' did *not* 'bark', as no college came forward to assert this, although I waited several weeks to see if one would. Not a single college stated that they were scouting Trayvon Martin at all, let alone seriously.
This told me volumes, as if he were the athletic paragon that was being claimed, there could only be one possible explanation as to why colleges would have little to no interest in him. That explanation would be that he had discipline problems of a rather serious nature.So it turned out to be...
the infowarrior
To: South40; VitacoreVision
There is mention of past marijuna use. Usually people on MJ are nonviolent. Was a drug test performed on Martin’s body and what were the results??
To: VitacoreVision
Conservatives "have hastily embraced caricatures of Trayvon Martin, painting him as a vicious street thug who deserved his fate." Forget this "caricature" nonsense and focus on what Trayvon Martin DID.
Do you see any evidence that he might have been a vicious street thug?
20
posted on
07/16/2013 11:08:10 PM PDT
by
TChad
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson