Missed the point. All I really want to know is if any of the usual suspects had anything to say about the conduct of the prosecution, that I might have missed. If you read my post you would know that I said that there was more than enough evidence and testimony to acquit GZ beyond any doubt.
The point is that these prosecutors were not incompetent. They were crooked. I think it is ridiculous to chalk up this acquittal to their incompetence . They could not have gotten an honest conviction so they resorted to trickery and deceit. They were very good at that.