The prosecution was inept in charging him, not in the court.
They had nothing to work with.
The man killed Martin in self defense.
He should have never been charged.
I think you're missing my point. Why hasn't Al Sharpton criticized the prosecutors for doing stupid things like sending up prosecution witnesses that hurt their case; like overcharging in the first place? From what that juror said last night, a better prosecution might have swayed the jury the other way, at least from the way she described jury sentiment at the beginning of deliberations.
It's more in character for somebody like Sharpton to accuse the state of intentionally sandbagging to avoid convicting the "white" guy. So why hasn't he?