I actually watched most of the prosecution presentation and that weird closing.
I thought they put on an excellent case for reasonable doubt or total doubt of the charges, For The Freakin Defense!!!!
It was so pathetic or blatant, not sure which, I didn’t bother to listen to the Defense.
Absolutely weird.
Don’t understand why everyone who is agitated over this isn’t screaming about that display of ??????
MSNBC article written by an idiot. “If Zimmerman had testified...” He would have been twisted apart in cross examination. Obviously, the defense exercised his 5th Amendmnt rights. How is an effective defense responsible for the collapse of the American judicial system? Yes, show trials in totalitarian societies always result in convictions. That how their judicial systems work.
The entirety of this show trial was aimed solely at what is happening now, the aftermath.
Considering the evidence, the best case that the prosecution had was to induce “reasonable doubt” in the minds of the jurors- reasonable doubt that Z was innocent. It was a hard way to go to convince the jurors that they needed to convict because there might be a glimmer of doubt that Z could be innocent.