[tanknetter]

It gets worse (or better, depending how you look at it) as you keep reading.

It actually gets more and more amusing.

Two points on this - the Liberals are now doing something they're really good at: presenting the argument that it didn't work because the "right people" weren't the ones doing it.

Second, I said a day or two ago that a really good option for Conservatives would be to start arguing that the State intentionally threw the case. This writer seems to be going down that road, but doesn't quite get there. But I think it's a sign that things are moving, quickly, in that direction.

[Nervous Tick]

>> It actually gets more and more amusing.

She lost me when she opined that no prosecutor worth his salt would have played Z’s police interview for the jury, leaning instead on his five earlier calls ato the NEN about suspicious characters, and “forcing” Z to testify.

Say what?

If the prosecution hadn’t used the interview tapes, the defense surely would have — selectively. And their “ain’t” no forcing him to testify.

I wonder where in the pseudo-journalism training process she failed to learn to THINK.