On the outside one would think so nut from the OS article linked at 68:
Literary and media manager Sharlene Martin said:
“My hope is that people will read Juror B37’s book, written with her attorney husband, and understand the commitment it takes to serve and be sequestered on a jury in a highly publicized murder trial and how important, despite one’s personal viewpoints, it is to follow the letter of the law,” Martin said in a statement. “
It could open a whole new dialogue about laws that may need to be revised and revamped to suit a 21st century way of life.
“The reader will also learn why the jurors had no option but to find Zimmerman Not Guilty due to the manner in which he was charged and the content of the jury instructions,” the statement says.
*THIS* disturbs me, greatly. There is absolutely *NO*, I repeat, *NO* difference in basic human nature throughout recorded history. The obvious inference here, is that human nature is a *CONSTANT*.
Anyone who professes a belief that the building blocks of a successful society need to be changed to reflect the 'change' of what is, in essence, a verifiable constant, is a complete and utter dolt.
Human nature is/has been/will always be the same, no matter if your framing it in the twelfth century, the twenty first, or the forty-fifth. A constant, is a constant, is a constant, it is, by definition, unchanging...
the infowarrior
I see your point now. I guess we will have to wait and see what nuggets of grand info they decide to impart on us.
So tired of the social engineering aspect of all this sh**