>> Isn’t this what the OP is talking about and linked to in this thread?
Semantics question. If you want to call it a “new investigation” I suppose you could think of it that way.
I don’t... from the article, it looks like more of a review of existing evidence to see if federal prosecution is warranted (or possible — they can’t try him on murder or manslaughter, because he has been acquitted of those and there’s no double jeopardy).
I think they’re just blowing smoke to appease their race grievance friends. We’ll see.
Yes they did this already though.