Green Energy’s Too Expensive (Title Needs Correction)

Townhall.com ^ | July 14, 2013 | Marita Noon

[Kaslin]

On Wednesday, July 10, the House passed H.R. 2609—which Bloomberg News called a “$30.4 Billion Energy-Water Spending Measure.” The 2014 Energy-Water Development appropriations bill will cut spending on renewables and other green energy programs in half and was passed mostly along party lines—with 4 Republicans voting against and 7 Democrats for it.

[Kaslin]

The correct title should be:Green Energy Is Too Expensive

[Smokin' Joe]

The “green” in “Green Energy” comes from the money poured into it, not it being better for the planet an all that.

[jimsin]

'The “green” in “Green Energy” comes from the money poured into it, not it being better for the planet an all that.'

NOT SO FAST THERE S/J..let's at least give g. energy a CHANCE....IF WE JUST POUR SAY BETWEEN 100 AN 200 TRILLION MORE INTO IT..and it THEN doesn't pan out..i say SURE it aint feasible....until that time LET'S ROLLLL! (INTO NATIONAL BANKRUPTCY)