To: Kaslin
It bemuses me that George Zimmerman’s detractors keep referring to Trayvon Martin as a “child.” He was 17—old enough to join the Armed Forces.
When I was seventeen, I graduated from high school and was accepted into college. In those days, no one referred to 17-year-olds as children.
4 posted on
07/14/2013 7:46:53 AM PDT by
Fiji Hill
To: Fiji Hill
Government bean counters will statistically tally trademark as a child lost to gun violence instead of tallying George as a victim saved from a violent death.
23 posted on
07/14/2013 8:04:17 AM PDT by
BOBWADE
(RINOs suck)
To: Fiji Hill
A 4 year old is a child, so is a 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 year old, but a 17 year old is not a child.
Also a 10 year old and up should know right from wrong. Perhaps even a 7 or 8 year old.
26 posted on
07/14/2013 8:07:06 AM PDT by
Kaslin
(He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
To: Fiji Hill
In those days, no one referred to 17-year-olds as children.
Today, 26 year olds are referred to as children so they can be included on mommy and daddy's health insurance.
33 posted on
07/14/2013 8:11:14 AM PDT by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: Fiji Hill
For the first two months of college I was still 17. I turned 18 as a Freshman.
To: Fiji Hill
Unfortunately that’s how a lot of folks think (or rather don’t): everyone’s a child until the magical day when they’ve been breathing outside the womb for 18 years, when suddenly they’re an “adult” (well, except as regards drinking alcohol).
66 posted on
07/14/2013 12:24:17 PM PDT by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson