I’m just responding to those who say the guy got what he deserved. The prosecution says Martin feared for his life. (I know they don’t know what he was thinking) Assuming that’s true, did he have the right to punch Zimmerman. I say “Yes”. But I don’t believe that’s true. Therefore I don’t believe Martin or this guy in the bar had the right or justification to punch a drunk.
There is a big difference between the concepts of 'deserved' and 'justified.' A difference that liberals usually fail to see completely and one of the reasons they are unable to think rationally. It is unfortunate that there are a number here who are having the same difficulty engaging their faculties of reason. :-)