Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Chip

I’m guessing the longer this goes, the more likely it will be a hung jury.
And it would also seem that the lack of a quick deliberation and verdict would rule out both 2nd degree murder and/or an outright acquittal.
But I’m not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV, so who knows.
Thoughts?


878 posted on 07/13/2013 11:44:34 AM PDT by mkleesma (`Call to me, and I will answer you and tell you great and unsearchable things you do not know.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mkleesma

Have you ever spent the night at a Holiday Inn Express? ;-)


892 posted on 07/13/2013 11:47:41 AM PDT by MagUSNRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 878 | View Replies ]

To: mkleesma

I think our greater danger is the manslaughter issue. It carries a very heavy term.

Hung jury means they try him again and they usually win the second time.

It has to be total acquittal to celebrate.


899 posted on 07/13/2013 11:50:36 AM PDT by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 878 | View Replies ]

To: mkleesma
I’m guessing the longer this goes, the more likely it will be a hung jury.

I think it's too early for that. They may feel obligated as a jury to atleast do a gratuitious run through all the evidence -- and that takes time.

They can't afford to reach a decision that appears to the public to be not well thought out especially in this charged environment.

931 posted on 07/13/2013 12:01:34 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 878 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson