Now we have to accept the fact that between the jury and us, there are two completely different trials. The prosecution has theoretically won because they prevailed in getting critical evidence eliminated that was favorable to Z. As far as we know the jury is deliberating because a grown man killed a child, Probably, child slaughter.
As far as we know the jury is deliberating because a grown man killed a child, Probably, child slaughter.
I would hope that they make the connection between having the call for child abuse thrown out, that they would realize they shouldn’t consider him a child and rule on that emotional basis.
Also, as some of them are Mom’s I would also hope that they realize that there’s a difference between child, and teenager.
A lot of Hopes but thats unfortunately what this cut and dried case has come down to.