Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Secret Agent Man

It likely means there is disagreement among the jurors and they are looking for clarification to help break the stalemate. That can be good or bad for the defense.


1,524 posted on 07/13/2013 3:14:57 PM PDT by ilgipper (Obama is proving that very bad ideas can be wrapped up in pretty words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1451 | View Replies ]


To: ilgipper

It could go either way, it could be a juror who wants to acquit and the others want manslaughter and they are trying to convince her to hop on board the manslaughter train, OR it could mean that there is one juror who wants manslaughter and the others want to acquit and they are trying to convince her to acquit


1,527 posted on 07/13/2013 3:15:56 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1524 | View Replies ]

To: ilgipper

I am praying they jurors for acquitting convince those in doubt why if they have doubt, they cannot charge him with either murder 2 or manslaughter. DOUBT == ACQUIT

And I sincerely do not believe anyone on that jury was convinced beyond all reasonable doubt George’s actions live up to murder 2 or manslaughter.

I think the holdout has doubt, but just wants to do a compromise. And if they follow instructions there is no provision for compromise. If they haven’t proven murder 2 they also haven’t proven manslaughter. The doubt that exists to acquit on murder 2 is the same doubt that must make them acquit on manslaughter.


1,629 posted on 07/13/2013 3:31:04 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1524 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson